LinkedinTwitterThe DetailsConnectBlog Facebook Meet the TherapistHome For Writers

Monday, April 1, 2013

Character Archetypes 101: The Innocent

The Innocent is the first archetype on the couch in my new series. (If you missed the series introduction, click here.) The Innocent is also known in archetype circles as the child, Utopian, traditionalist, saint, romantic, and the dreamer.

The "Good"

The Innocent's greatest strength comes in their trust and eternal optimism. They are pure, wholesome, full of virtue. They are endearing to others with their enthusiastic sense of wonder and positive energy. They encourage others with simple solutions and inner calm. They are open and honest in all relationships.

They are genuinely concerned with others' well-being, and this translates into helping profession careers like therapists, coaches, guides, and social workers. Their ability to be accepting, gentle, and idealistic lends them to compassionate hobbies, as well. They are excited when able to put feet to their personal values and beliefs, which include love, hope, and perseverance in the face of obstacles. Innocents inspire people around them, keep the faith and loyally stay the course.

Jung first gave name to the Child archetype, and later, Caroline Myss said that everyone has part of the Child/Innocent in them, as part of the four "survival archetypes." I agree with this assessment, because people all have times when they want to be light-hearted and playful. We can still maintain the priorities of adult life while tapping into our inner youthfulness.

The "Bad"

Known as the "Shadow" in archetype-land, there are less than savory aspects to all archetypes. The Innocent is no exception, despite the warm and fuzzy name. Innocents risk being too dependent on others. They may deny their own weaknesses or simply be blind to them, as well as deny real problems that might not be solved by their simplistic outlook on life.

In their youthful exuberance, they may be too spontaneous or fanciful, and expose themselves to the harsh realities of the world. They are incredibly naive, willing to believe the best about others. They may cling to remaining loyal when loyalty is not deserved. They may also be obedient to the point of conformity.

And let's face it...Innocents can just be childish. They might blame others, take risks, become addicted to wanting more (a syndrome with which parents the world over are familiar). They might not deal well with transitions or change. Their optimism might sometimes border along the lines of irrationality.

Likely Goals

To be happy
To be free
To be unconditionally loved and accepted
To be protected and safe

Likely Fears

To be captive (physically, emotionally, etc.)
To be punished for doing something wrong
To be rejected or abandoned
To be in danger

Examples in the Media

  • Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz is perhaps a prime example of an Innocent. Her song, "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" could be the theme song for Innocents everywhere. 
  • Cinderella, always keeping the faith and remaining pure and sweet. Many Disney princesses fit this archetype.
  • Forrest in Forrest Gump.
  • Mary Poppins.
  • Maria in The Sound of Music.

Let's Analyze

What other sorts of things would you want me to expound on in these posts? I'm open to suggestions...and as I'm just starting out with the series, it's not trouble at all to change directions.

Comments (18)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I'd like to understand how characters (and real human beings too!) can combine seemingly opposite characteristics. In Myss' terms, how could an Innocent, for instance, have an area of life in which the Saboteur energies predominate? How would such a person handle the cognitive dissonance that might generate?
7 replies · active 330 weeks ago
well, i'll hazard a guess. :) no one is all good or all bad. donald maass (literary agent who wrote Writing the Breakout Novel book and workbook) capitalizes on this fact and said that most memorable heroes or villains always have a dark side or redeeming side, respectively.

cognitive dissonance (the uncomfortable feeling from holding two conflicting beliefs/thoughts simultaneously) is in all of us, whether we recognize it in the moment or not. environmental events can be such that the other traits come to the fore without us consciously thinking that what we're doing or thinking goes against the grain, so to speak. the old adage, "never say never, cause that's a long time" applies here. when pressed, or in survival mode, certain belief systems can go out the window in a heartbeat.

i'm interested in what you think about this. i love conversations on my blog, and today i'm off work, so i can actually comment more! :)
I signed up for notifications of new posts, and I never get them until the day after you post. :) Ah, well...

I like how you're breaking these down into practical parts and ready identifiers. Archetypes can be written really well, so that they touch the soul of the reader, or very poorly, so that they come across as a cardboard cut-out--or plastic Jesus. Some examples I think would be good--of writers who showcase an archetype well, as well as stories where an obvious archetype is used but not well fleshed-out. (I hesitate to suggest bashing authors or characters who mean well.)

One other element to include might be how the archetype of the day relates to other archetypes. Some should get along. Some should not. Really Not. :) There aren't hard and fast rules about relationships, of course, but you're pretty insightful about combining fiction and education.
Thanks for the ideas, Lex. I'm going to modify this post slightly with them in mind.
And you know, I think a wrap-up couple of posts about the interaction with and relation to other archetypes might be best...otherwise, saying which archetypes they get along with or don't won't mean much. What say you? I value your opinion. :)
No, I think a wrap-up of interactions and relations sounds very good. There's a handy little mini Meyers-Briggs test online (@ humanmetrics.com) that points readers to a great set of explanations about the personality types, but the interaction parts are kind of encoded so that if you don't know their language and interpretation, you won't be able to navigate well. So, this idea will probably work better. I like the examples you added. :)
Lavendartime's avatar

Lavendartime · 354 weeks ago

Psychological survival mode is what made me believe an affair didnt matter.
Real astrology can answer that for you. We are under the "influence" of different energy patterns as represented by the planets. As "mystical" and as "silly" as astrology may seem to others, the empirical observations that "fits" the astrological descriptions as portrayed in our natal chart, are just too many to ignore the subject. And Carl Jung was very much into astrology, for those who doesn't know that fact.

Anyway, my 2 cent, 🙏👍.
Freaky! Shadow characteristics are very interesting...thanks for this.
Hrm. I'd like to hear about two things in particular. One more than the other.
How do these archetypes apply to non-protagonist characters? Especially antagonists. That's a biggie for me, I have trouble creating a believable but hateable antagonist.

The other thing is rather minor, but I love it when people do it. I like mixing music, art, and writing in one giant awesome piece, despite how...unfeasible it is for the common person. I smiled when I read about Somewhere over the rainbow, made me think about this in a new light. Try to draw in more music, please?
1 reply · active 424 weeks ago
I love the idea of combining music, writing and art, and tend to do this in the work that I do.
who would be a famous person with this archetype?
2 replies · active 366 weeks ago
Michael Jackson??
Yes, I think he is a good example.
Hi Jeannie.
I would like to know what are the main shadoews for this archetype and how they can be integrated.
Thanks
1 reply · active 425 weeks ago
Myer/Briggs .... Infp.... Individualization process
Archetypes are very interesting: I've done several of the available quizzes and they consistently come up with The Child as both my archetype and persona. Childhood experiences, our environments and one's own personality modifies how we express our archetypes: I definitely embody this archetype but have a strong individualistic streak plus healthy distrust that saves me from being taken advantage of but tend to get impacted by my close personal relationships.40 years of arthritis then fibromyalgia means that I struggle between being fully independent and needing to depend on others, so my fears of being rejected/abandoned and not being accepted have been grounded in experience with close personal friends and partners.While I am very resilient my practical need to be financially dependent as well as requiring physical support from my current partner causes me great anxiety and stress.

I believe we carry all the archetypes within us which we tap into when needed, although they get filtered by our predominate archetype. Without reading Carolyn Myss' take on this i believe that The Child is an important archetype that we all need to consciously cultivate to develop and maintain personal psychological balance as well as insight into others.
nice post admin

Post a new comment

Comments by