It's becoming very clear that most people have some sort of trauma in their background. It's not so much a question of IF the person has trauma, but HOW MUCH trauma they have. Therapists who do not assess for trauma are doing their clients an injustice.
So how should this inform your writing?
The medical model influences the way we think about a lot of things. Instead of looking at positives and strengths, we often focus on areas of weakness or symptoms. As a result, a typical question to our characters (and to other people) is couched this way:
What is wrong with you?
There is an assumption when reading (and writing) a book that something is wrong with the characters...something that needs to be fixed before the end of the book.
Character's can't remain static, they have to change. We use the character flaw to inform our writing and the character arc process, much like a therapist uses a diagnosis to inform treatment. Flaws need to be "healed" or at the very least improved upon by novel's end.
But I'd like to propose another question that you should ask your character, based on the field of psychology and the trauma lens that we need to view people (and characters!) through:
What has happened to you?
This is a huge shift from thinking about symptoms (flaws, if you will) and thinking about story. No one develops a flaw in isolation or out of the blue. Their environment, family, friends, etc., all play a role in shaping that character, giving them a reason to do what they do, or think the way they do.
What this question is really asking for is BACKSTORY.
Having a solid understanding of your character's background, their upbringing, their family dynamics, whether or not they had an attachment to caregivers, their social supports...all of this factors into the development of their flaw, which is where your story starts, in medias res (in the middle of things), before their world gets rocked by the call to action.
A character's flaw does not define them. Their backstory gives context to the flaw's development. (Click to tweet!)
So take time to understand your character's backstory. It'll be the skeleton on which you hang the muscles and skin of your story. Just like a real skeleton, the readers will never see it, but it will govern and guide the story start to finish.
Let's Analyze
What do you think about asking the new question of "What happened to you?" instead of "What's wrong with you?" How might this impact your understanding of characterization...and people in general?
Logging you in...
JPG · 627 weeks ago
keligwyn 52p · 627 weeks ago
jodi · 627 weeks ago
I really like this! Thanks
Lex Keating · 627 weeks ago
I have a "Character Breakdown" sheet I developed for any character giving me fits (this is tailored to how I think, most people don't operate like this...), and your question of "What happened to you?" is an interesting one. My breakdown sheets are a single page, more for a quick reference for me to get a handle on perspective, but this question applies to two sections of the breakdown. First, I have a section on relationships, and I give myself room to write a couple sentences each on relationship with God, with self, and with others. "What happened to you?" comes into play differently in each of these three areas. Second, the last note I give myself on this breakdown is a list of "Charms." Not perfect things about a character, but what makes him/her worth writing about. A wry sense of humor, a willingness to see both sides of an argument, a desperate fear of change, a conviction that borders on arrogance--quirks that are all outgrowths of that question "What happened?"
On the whole, much more gracious and patient than "What's wrong with you?"
@Raven_Wing7 · 627 weeks ago
@rachelleighgeek · 627 weeks ago
gretavdr 33p · 627 weeks ago