But TV series, comics, and books are being rebooted at a rapid rate. Here's a list of a few that I can think of off the top of my head:
Beauty and the Beast (2012) just kicked off it's first season, and it's nothing like good ol' Linda Hamilton and animal-human hybrid Vincent. Beauty's a kick-butt detective and Vincent (yes, name remains the same) is a former medical doctor-turned-soldier after 9-11 who was injected with something that makes him like the Incredible Hulk when he's mad.
Elementary (2012) might be the most interesting reboot Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has been through yet. Lucy Liu plays Watson, a surgeon-turned-"companion" to addicts, namely, one Sherlock Holmes. They live in New York, and he consults with the rather slow police detectives and wows them with his powers of observation, deduction, and reasoning. No doubt there will be romantic tension eventually between the two.
James Bonds is still alive and kicking, with Skyfall, the 23rd official movie, set to come out in November. Very similar to the reboot of Batman, starting with Batman Begins in 2005. I can't begin to recount the number of recent fairy tale remakings, but here's just a short list: Mirror, Mirror; Snow White and the Huntsman; Beastly; and Red Riding Hood for films and Grimm and Once Upon a Time for television series.
Comic reboots for both Marvel and DC have abounded with Man of Steele, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, Thor, Captain America and Arrow.
And of course fiction utilizes plot conceptualizations all the time. Jane Austen's books have to have been the inspiration for more retellings than any other author alive. I just finished The Overnight Socialite by Bridie Clark, which was a fresh retake of My Fair Lady. Melanie Dickerson writes portrayals of fairy tales in her series, with her Snow White retelling set to release this December.
I've made my case for the vast amount of literature being regurgitated in various arenas and ways. It's not a question of whether it's smart or smarmy to reboot. The biggest advantage is that you have a built-in audience who will buy your work simply because they love the concept behind it. They are loyal to the origins of your inspiration, and are happy enough to pay homage to their heroes through reboots.
The real question is this: Is it smart or smarmy to reboot a classic the way YOU want to do?
The stakes are higher when rebooting due to the possibility of disappointed expectations. People expect a Pride & Prejudice retelling and that's what they better get, only in some infinitesimal way, it's got to exceed their expectations. No one truly thinks that the story can be told better than how Jane Austen did...so if you're going to shoot for the stars, be prepared to land hard on your rump if you miss.
guest · 648 weeks ago
And it was sooo bad that no one's tried it since. Thank goodness.
jeanniecampbell 76p · 648 weeks ago
melaniedickerson 4p · 648 weeks ago
I think my first book was more of an "inspired by" Sleeping Beauty book, and my other two have been retellings of Beauty and the Beast and Snow White. The reason I think retellings of fairy tales works so great is because fairy tales are short, without a lot of detail or characterization, so an author can take the story and the concepts behind it and just really expand it and really make it a great novel and still stay true to the original story concept, which doesn't alienate them from fans of the original fairy tale. And a dozen authors can take the same fairy tale and still come up with completely unique stories. I love it! :-)
jeanniecampbell 76p · 648 weeks ago
Lex Keating · 648 weeks ago
As an avid lover of fairy tales, I have to add that I think the trouble with reboots lies in the author depending on the reader, rather than the character, to do all the empathy. If a character is engaging and fresh, the reader will adapt to changes and familiarities. If the writer is trusting the reader to be familiar with the character, the reader tends to notice quickly that the characterization falls a little flat.
rachelwilderwrites 8p · 648 weeks ago
But then I'm more than a little biased because I think Moffat is a freakin' genius and I'm quite the student in the Moffat School of Characterization and Wibbly-Wobbly Timey-Wimey.