The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (or DSM-IV-TR for short) is called the therapist's "bible," although I'm not thrilled with that association. (I've only got ONE Bible, thank you.) It's put out by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the list price of it is about $89, but you can get it from Amazon for $72.
The DSM lists the criteria for mental disorders. Each disorder is given a specific code (i.e. 301.13) and this code is recognized by health professionals everywhere in the US. (Like, I know 301.13 is Cyclothymic Disorder).
In addition to the criteria (list of symptoms to look for in a patient), the DSM provides a lot of other helpful information about each disorder. (Psychiatric terms in bold italics)
- Diagnostic Features - this is the criteria written out in paragraph form, often with illustrative examples
- Subtypes and/or Specifiers - gives whether there are different types of a disorder (like there are several types of schizophrenia); specifiers simply give more specifics on the disorder, like when the onset was, or if a certain feature is more prevalent over another
- Associated Features and Disorders - this gives clinical features that are frequently associated with the disorder, but aren't required to make a diagnosis, as well as associated medical and physical examination findings (i.e., people with an eating disorder are likely to have dental erosion or alcoholics typically can have cirrhosis of the liver)
- Specific Culture, Age, and Gender Features - sometimes people present a disorder in a way that doesn't completely add up with the description on the page, and the reason could be one of the above listed, i.e., their developmental stage or cultural setting
- Prevalence - the section gives known information for prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk; when it's known, this information includes different settings - community, primary care, outpatient mental health clinics and inpatient psychiatric settings
- Course - gives the typical lifetime patterns of the disorder: how it's presented, how it evolves, typical age of onset, mode of onset (was it abrupt like PTSD or gradual like Alzheimer's?), whether it's in episodes (episodic) or a continuous course, a single episode v. recurrent, the duration of the disorder, as well as the typical length of the illness and it's progression over time (stable, worsening, improving)
- Familial Pattern - looks at the frequency of the disorder among first-degree biological relatives compared with the general population
- Differential Diagnosis - probably one of my most favorite sections, as it gives possible other diagnoses that might be similar as far as presentation and then how to differentiate between the two (or three or five)
There is talk of including internet addiction, compulsive shopping, or premenstrual dysphoric disorder--that's right, ladies. The real name for PMS, and it's not actually a diagnosis right now!--as well as getting rid of schizoaffective disorder and possible gender identity disorder to reflect the changing times. Major changes within editions usually make the news, the biggest being in 1974 when the APA took out homosexuality as a disorder. As you can imagine, new editions cause LOTS of controversy between professionals in the field as well as political and religious leaders.
But one thing remains the same: this is the therapist's manual. I never see a client when I don't break out this really large book of almost 1000 pages. You can see how this would be helpful in writing, right?
Q4U: Which of the eight sections do you think would be most helpful when writing?
Join me next Thursday as I discuss the multi-axial format of the DSM and why this is extremely useful.
12 comments:
I'm going to go with #4 and #6. I can't choose just one. They all seem like the would be important fro different reasons. I really enjoy you posts Jeannie. They inspire me to think about future ideas.
thanks heather. and i agree, they are all SO important. i couldn't imagine leaving one out. :)
Oooh, I have no clue which would be more helpful. Maybe number one, because it would help me really KNOW my character?
Cool book!
I'd think #s 1, 2 & 6 would be the most helpful to a writer, but especially #6.
#1 & 2 seem like they'd be inter-related, so they'd need to be applied together. To me, that's what a writer may use to get the symptoms of the disorder.
#6 would be important because it would tell you if what you're planning to inflict on your characters is feasible. (Hey, I wouldn't want a therapist e-mailing me after I published a book and telling me 6 reasons why my character couldn't have XYZ disorder!)
Good information. Going to have to share this site with some of my writer and non-writer friends. :)
If I didn't have slight hypochondriac tendancies, I might get this book.
tara - LAUGHED out loud.
liberty - please share the site! thanks. :)
Fantastic blog, Jeannie! (I got here following the intriguing "character therapist" link on a remark you posted about my plagiarism post in the QueryTracker.net Blog.) Instant Follow!
Archetype Writing: The Writer's Guide to Psychology
QueryTracker.net Blog: Helping Writers Become Authors
carolyn - i've been to your archtype blog many times...excellent articles there! :) thanks for visiting. it's neat that we sorta do the same thing. :)
Gosh, now I worry what my counsellor must be looking up after I leave :)
I'd love to have that book. the mind interests me no end.
I think I'd go with the first one. I think that would give me the most ideas for writing!
To me, this sounds like one of those Algebra texts that took me for a loop. I don't think I would be able to understand any of those sections. How sad is that?
I think #1 goes without saying, but the Familial one sounds interesting. I find it fascination how issues/disorders can run in families. It could make for some interesting conflict.
Post a Comment
Both comments and questions are welcome. I hope you enjoyed your time on the couch today.